This framework, a fundamental concept in AP Human Geography, analyzes global economic and political connections. It categorizes countries into core, periphery, and semi-periphery based on their roles in the global economy. Core nations are typically developed, industrialized countries that dominate global trade and exploit peripheral countries for raw materials and cheap labor. Periphery nations are less developed, often exporting raw materials to core nations and relying on them for manufactured goods. Semi-periphery nations occupy an intermediate position, exhibiting characteristics of both core and periphery countries. An example would be the United States (core), Bangladesh (periphery), and Brazil (semi-periphery).
Understanding this perspective is crucial because it provides a lens through which to analyze global inequality, dependency, and the flow of resources and capital. Its historical roots lie in dependency theory, which challenges modernization theory’s assumption that all countries can develop in the same way. Examining global economic relationships reveals patterns of power and exploitation that shape development trajectories and influence migration patterns. This viewpoint allows for a more nuanced understanding of the spatial organization of the global economy.